Reply to President's two letters

Dear TC member friends,

I am sure you will spend a few minutes for the facts

I am putting forth before you. I am also sure that you 

will be interested to know the reality, what is happening

in Trainers Circle ? Each reply from our President is exposinghim more.

He is unaware he is more trapped now with his replies.

Let me make it clear: My only intention is to set the house

in order, with pucca Bye laws, rules and regulations, how to

function.

Our President's only intention is : Sending me and Mr.Raja

out.  Nothing else.

Why now TC is not in order:

1.Secretary is not signatory to Bank account/s. He was not aware about the transactions in the Bank. Accounts are not put before the members till this minute for ratification/sanction. He claims that Treasurer need not put the accounts for every meeting. Then who holds responsibility for lakhs of rupees ? Who is accountable ?

The present signatories are accountable for every single rupee.

Because it is public money. Members' money. 

2.Bye laws are not given to the members. Any organization

will love to give the bye laws first to the members, even

before any demand is made. In our TC, even after the

demand is made, Bye law is not shared. 

3. Only President is taking all the actions. Neither Secretary or other EC members are  consulted. There is no democratic style now.

From President's reply	My reply
Our Auditor says that as per our registered Bye-Laws there is no provision for Advisor or Convenor and we shall go by that.	In the first meeting itself, I refused any post for me. Since I also took the initiative to form TC, that post was offered. If it is not in Bye law, how the letter head carry my name first ? All of a sudden 'we shall go by that' how appears ?
Any organization is run by the Secretary except ours where I have been doing everything	Yes, In TC, our President has done everything keeping the Secretary away. Since Pres. is taking care, Secretary allowed. One fine day, President says, Secretary has not done anything, we have to find a new secretary, (as if the present secretary is resigning or willing to resign). It is an insult to the Secretary who is very well present in the meeting.
The new Secretary shall mail the bye-laws to all Members.	When President has time to reply in length, can't he send the soft copy of Byelaws to the members ? or Can't he depute the work to any committee to forward it to all members ? How much time will it take ? Why new Secretary ? Why not the present Secretary ? I am ready to do that job.
If an one-line mail reminder (about bye laws) was sent I would have organized.	Who stops now ?
Our Auditor says that as President I can call for a EGM and place their names for removal in case they do not resign form TC's membership.	Where is the question of resigning from TC ? Will I leave the TC in this state without setting right ? In GB or EGB members things will take care. Myself or Raja have not done anything against TC or its Members. Our hands are clean. If we are removed, TC/decision makers will face the legal complications. I am ready to meet the AAS team in the Court.
Second letter: As per the Audito-Advocate Team, the Meeting dt 26Jan2015 on which we elected MrShanmugaSundaram and MrRajaK is void since they were not members of TC that day.  The Bye-Laws does not allow non-members to be elected.	How AAS (not AAP) team born ? Who is misguiding whom. If the decisions taken on 26 Jan.15 is void, then our President has also took charge on that day. It is an adhoc team till the next GB. Somebody has to start the Circle. The present team came into existence on 26 Jan 15. Before that nobody is member of TC (new). If that is void, all the subsequent meetings are void.
Technically, the Exec Comm as registered with Saidapet Registrar remains as the Exec Comm members	We hv to check up whether the present team is registered after 26.01.15 or not. If not, why it is not done ?
If both of them do not resign the suggestion is that I as President could call for an EC Meet of (old) existing EC-members and terminate the membership of both.  The Bye-Laws are clear that an EGM / EGM is not required.  I shall do so	Who has given the power to President to remove any member ? What mistakes done by myself or Mr.Raja (except exposing a lot). No valid reasons are there. Which bye law says that EGM is not required ? Why only talking about removing ?  Why the word EC Meet of (old) is appearing ? Does it mean, the present TC is running in old registration ? Is it not under Society Act ? Is it under running under Proprietorship or Trustee ? If so, then members are fooled all along. Trust is completely lost on the President.
Initiating legal action was also explored on both of them for disrupting the TC Meet that necessitated the President to go	What is disruption ? I put forth certain points to strengthen the TC. Mr.Raja put forth certain points, which are to be clarified/discussed. If any lacunae were there, they have to be set right for smooth running. If raising certain points, in a democratic way is called DISRUPTION in your dictionary ?  Then any member cannot question anything in future. Members cannot be slaves. We are members. That is what all the communications say. No threatening style is allowed for democratic functioning. I have an open mind to face any legal action. Every body knows, who will be trapped ? We don’t have any skeletons in our cupboard.
The defamation-trigger was 'There are 10 people who want the life membership back because Shankar is the President'	10 people are questioning the style of functioning of President. Then President has to explain and convince not only those 10, but also all the others. President has to prove it that TC is functioning democratically. You don’t have answer. You don’t want to reply.
The Auditor-Advocate team asked: What did they want ... it is not possible for them to take-over TC because of the technicality explained above	Why AAS team is fearing about take-over ? Who wants domination ? AAS team still unable to understand that EVERYBODY  wants the bye law now and the statement of accounts now. Why should we wait for a new Secretary or new AGM or GB ?

I am really thankful for many members who are supporting my points and telling me that whatever points I raise are VALID ONES. Surprisingly, many trainers, in an unexpected numbers talked to me, mailed me, sent sms me. Three members guided me more. I am happy that members are now vigilant. Yes, our members are learned people and wise. Since because nobody has raised these points or sent mails now to TC group, we should not underestimate them. They know, if they don't raise up at the appropriate time, there will be no Trainer Circle in future to help the trainers. 

AMICABLE SOLUTION: 1. The Bye laws and statement of accounts should be sent to all members. Members have the right.

2. Xerox/scanned copy of the filing of amendments to include the present team with the authorities should be sent to all. 

3. New General Body should be conducted to elect a new team.

If things are clean, all members will get these within a week.

Let us unite and make Trainers Circle stronger, by making the bye laws (foundation) pucca. 

Rgds

A.Shanmugasundaram

Advisor-cum-Convenor/Founder

Trainers Circle

98404 85595